Where every figure came from
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Review of the Federal Reserve's Supervision and Regulation of Silicon Valley Bank (28 April 2023) (The balance sheet, the run, and the four causes): https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/svb-review-20230428.pdf. US federal government work, public domain. Key Takeaways 1-4: the board and management failed to manage their risks (removed interest rate hedges; failed its own liquidity stress tests); supervisors did not fully appreciate the vulnerabilities as it grew; when they did, they did not take sufficient steps to make it fix them quickly; Key Takeaway 4: the way the Board tailored its rules after the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (2018), and a shift in the stance of supervisory policy impeded effective supervision; in 2019, after that law, the Fed revised its framework, which lowered requirements for SVB; higher requirements may not have prevented the failure but would likely have bolstered its resilience. Executive Summary: 31 open supervisory findings at failure, about triple peer firms; withdrawals that appear to have been sparked by interrelated factors (tech-sector uncertainty, possible rating action, and highly correlated withdrawals by a concentrated network of venture capital investors and technology firms, fuelled by social media). "Growth of SVBFG": in 2022, as rates began to rise, deposit outflows and a rapid rise in unrealized losses; Key Takeaway 1: slowing activity in the technology sector in 2022; from July 2022 the firm repeatedly failed its own internal liquidity stress tests; p.21 approximately 94 percent of deposits uninsured at year-end 2022; p.22 most HTM securities were agency MBS with maturity of 10 years or more; Table 1 (2022:Q4, per cent, SVBFG against large banking organisations): loans 35 against 58 of assets, securities 55 against 25, uninsured 94 against 41 of deposits. Table 1 note: large banking organisations are holding companies with assets over $100 billion, leaving out the largest firms supervised in the LISCC portfolio. Agency MBS are mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by US government agencies and government-sponsored enterprises. Executive Summary, "Failure of SVB": on 8 March 2023 it announced it had sold $21 billion of available-for-sale securities at a $1.8 billion after-tax loss. Preface: Vice Chair for Supervision Barr requested the review on 13 March 2023; it was prepared by Federal Reserve staff not involved in supervising SVB. Unrealised losses on HTM securities do not change their value on the balance sheet (note 40). Retrieved 3 October 2026.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Vice Chair for Supervision Michael S. Barr, testimony to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs (28 March 2023) (Who the depositors were): https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/testimony/barr20230328a.htm. US federal government work, public domain. Start-up depositors generally have no operating revenue and keep large cash balances to make payroll and pay expenses; they were connected through a network of venture capital firms and acted together when stress began; the bank did not have enough cash or collateral to meet the rapid outflows. Retrieved 3 October 2026.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Funds Target Range, Upper Limit (FRED series DFEDTARU) (The chart): https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DFEDTARU. Public Domain: Citation Requested (licence tag on the FRED series page, read 3 October 2026). Daily, per cent; the dates a new range took effect: 0.25 to 16 March 2022; 0.50 from 17 March 2022; 1.00 from 5 May; 1.75 from 16 June; 2.50 from 28 July; 3.25 from 22 September; 4.00 from 3 November; 4.50 from 15 December 2022; 4.75 from 2 February 2023. The chart ends on 15 March 2023, before the next change. Retrieved 3 October 2026 as CSV on the device and read twice.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Bank for International Settlements), Report on the 2023 banking turmoil (October 2023) (Why rates rose, and what that did to bond values): https://www.bis.org/publications/report-2023-banking-turmoil.pdf. (c) BIS 2023; paraphrased. Section 1, macrofinancial backdrop: in 2022 central banks tightened monetary policy to curb high inflation, and the rising-rate environment brought a sharp fall in the value of long-dated fixed-interest assets. Section 1, "First Republic Bank": its balance sheet resembled SVB's, with high uninsured deposits, venture capital clients and the same region, and it lost market and depositor confidence after SVB and Signature Bank failed. Retrieved 3 October 2026.
US Government Accountability Office, Bank Regulation: Preliminary Review of Agency Actions Related to March 2023 Bank Failures (GAO-23-106736, April 2023) (The unrealised losses, and the GAO's findings): https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-106736. US federal government work, public domain. A preliminary review. Highlights page ("What GAO Found"): in the GAO view, risky business strategies and weak liquidity and risk management contributed to the failures of SVB and Signature Bank; in the five years before 2023 regulators identified concerns, but both banks were slow to fix them, and regulators did not escalate in time. Page 15: at year-end 2022 SVB reported over $15 billion of unrealized losses on its held-to-maturity securities, equal to 89 percent of its common equity tier 1 capital. gao.gov refuses curl from both machines; read from the Internet Archive capture of the original PDF (http://web.archive.org/web/20260825050052/https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-23-106736.pdf, captured 25 August 2026), extracted twice (pdftotext and pypdf); it agrees with the GAO sentences returned earlier by the WebFetch tool. Retrieved 3 October 2026.
Financial Stability Board, 2023 Bank Failures: Preliminary lessons learnt for resolution (10 October 2023) (How customers could move money so fast): https://www.fsb.org/uploads/P101023.pdf. (c) FSB 2023; paraphrased. Section 2.1, "Background on the US bank failures": the run appears to have been fuelled by social media and a concentrated network of venture capital investors and technology firms; SVB set no daily withdrawal limits; its customers typically had accounts at other institutions ready to receive the money. Retrieved 3 October 2026.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Columbus, Ohio Assumes All the Deposits of First Republic Bank, San Francisco, California (PR-34-2023, 1 May 2023) (First Republic): https://www.fdic.gov/news/press-releases/2023/pr23034.html. US federal government work, public domain. First Republic Bank was closed by the California DFPI and the FDIC appointed receiver; JPMorgan Chase assumed all deposits and substantially all assets; as of 13 April 2023 First Republic had about $229.1 billion in total assets. Retrieved 3 October 2026.
US Department of the Treasury, Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC (12 March 2023) (The promise of a charge on banks): https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1337. US federal government work, public domain. Signature Bank, New York, closed that day by its state chartering authority, was covered by a similar systemic risk exception. The statement says that, as the law requires, a special assessment on banks will recover any loss the Deposit Insurance Fund bears in supporting uninsured depositors. Retrieved 3 October 2026.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, FDIC Board of Directors Issues a Final Rule on Special Assessment Pursuant to Systemic Risk Determination (PR-92-2023, 16 November 2023) (Who paid): https://www.fdic.gov/news/press-releases/2023/pr23092.html. US federal government work, public domain. The FDIC estimates that about $16.3 billion of the cost of the failures of SVB and Signature Bank was attributable to protecting uninsured depositors; the special assessment is levied at 13.4 basis points a year on each bank's estimated uninsured deposits at 31 December 2022 above the first $5 billion, for an expected eight quarters from 2024; about 114 banking organisations pay, none with total assets under $5 billion; the Chairman said the rule applies it to the banks that benefited most from the protection of uninsured depositors. Retrieved 3 October 2026.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, FDIC Releases Comprehensive Overview of Deposit Insurance System, Including Options for Deposit Insurance Reform (PR-35-2023, 1 May 2023) (The argument over deposit insurance): https://www.fdic.gov/news/press-releases/2023/pr23035.html. US federal government work, public domain. Names the current $250,000 limit. Three options: Limited Coverage (the current framework, possibly with a limit above the current $250,000); Unlimited Coverage (all depositors); Targeted Coverage (different limits by account type, with business payment accounts receiving much higher cover). The FDIC believes targeted coverage best meets the objectives of deposit insurance relative to its costs; the options would need Congress, though some parts lie within the FDIC's own rule-making. Retrieved 3 October 2026.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, press release on the Bank Term Funding Program (24 January 2024) (The end of the BTFP): https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20240124a.htm. US federal government work, public domain. The BTFP will cease making new loans as scheduled on 11 March 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2026.
All wording is our own. Charts are drawn from the data named under them.