Where every figure came from
Bank of England Database: LPMBL22 (monthly average of sterling reserve balance liabilities) and LPMAVAA (monthly average of sterling notes and coin in circulation, not seasonally adjusted) (Banks' reserves at the Bank and notes and coin in circulation): https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/boeapps/database/. Open Government Licence v3.0 (not an exchange-rate series). Retrieved 1 October 2026. Monthly averages of Wednesday amounts outstanding, GBP millions. LPMBL22: the twelve monthly averages from September 2007 to August 2008 average 25,490 (about GBP25 billion; derived); January 2022 976,913 (about GBP977 billion), the highest monthly average in the series, which starts in May 2006 (December 2021 970,294; February 2022 975,318). LPMAVAA: the same twelve months average 49,290 (about GBP49 billion; derived); January 2022 95,137 (about GBP95 billion). Derived: 976,913 / 25,490 = 38.3, so reserves rose nearly fortyfold (check answer 39 is 977/25 from the rounded figures on the page; tolerance 4 covers both). Reserves plus notes and coin rose from about GBP74.8 billion to about GBP1,072 billion, about 14 times, so the fortyfold rise is in reserves, not in the whole money base. The Bank also publishes reserves averaged over each maintenance period (YWMB43D), on which the highest figure is 973,635, for the period beginning 16 December 2021; this page uses the monthly series throughout.
Office for National Statistics, CPI annual rate 00: all items (series D7G7, dataset MM23) (Consumer prices, 2009 to 2019, and the episode chart): https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/inflationandpriceindices/timeseries/d7g7/mm23. Open Government Licence v3.0. Retrieved 1 October 2026 (release of 16 September 2026). Annual rates 2009 to 2019: 2.2, 3.3, 4.5, 2.8, 2.6, 1.5, 0.0, 0.7, 2.7, 2.5, 1.8 per cent; their mean is 2.24 (derived: about 2.2 per cent a year). Monthly rates in 2015 were between -0.1 and 0.1 per cent from February to November (the basis for: no higher than a year before, or slightly lower, for several months). Highest monthly rate 2009 to 2019: 5.2 per cent, September 2011. Chart: monthly annual rate, January 2009 to December 2019, per cent.
Bank of England, Minutes of the Monetary Policy Committee meeting held on 4 and 5 March 2009 (The first round was planned to run for three months): https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/minutes/2009/minutes-march-2009.pdf. Paraphrased; not quoted. Paras 40 and 41: the Committee voted for an initial programme of purchases to be made within three months, financed by central bank reserves. Para 31: sellers of assets were expected to use some or all of the money to buy other assets.
Giovanni Dell’Ariccia, Pau Rabanal and Damiano Sandri (International Monetary Fund), Unconventional Monetary Policies in the Euro Area, Japan, and the United Kingdom, Hutchins Center Working Paper 48, Brookings Institution, October 2018 (The first round: its completion and its effect on gilt yields and the pound): https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/WP48-DellAriccia-et-al.pdf. Paraphrased. Retrieved 1 October 2026. Section 4.1: purchases were later increased to GBP200 billion, about 13 per cent of 2009 GDP, and completed in January 2010. Section 4.2: studies of how gilt yields responded right after the Bank announced new purchases show that the GBP200 billion of the first round lowered yields by between 50 and 100 basis points; quantitative easing also appears to have brought a moderate depreciation of the pound (citing Joyce and others, 2011); effects on equity prices have been more difficult to identify.
Institute for Fiscal Studies, Green Budget 2022, chapter 7, Quantitative easing, monetary policy implementation and the public finances (The stock of gilts bought, end-2010, end-2019 and end-2021): https://ifs.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-10/Quantitative-easing-monetary-policy-implementation-and-the-public-finances-Green-Budget-2022.pdf. Paraphrased; read from the PDF text, page 11 and Figure 7.3 (cumulative gilt purchases through the Asset Purchase Facility). The stock of QE gilts was GBP200 billion at the end of 2010, GBP435 billion at the end of 2019 and GBP875 billion at the end of 2021; footnote 9: these figures are for gilts only. Derived: (875 - 435) / 875 = 50 per cent, so about half the stock was bought in 2020 and 2021.
Bank of England, Asset Purchase Facility Quarterly Report, 2022 Q1 (Gilts held at the end of 2021, and the valuation basis): https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/asset-purchase-facility/2022/2022-q1. Retrieved 1 October 2026. Table A: gilts GBP874,947 million at 2021 Q4, measured as the amount outstanding at 29 December 2021; note (b): the stock of gilt purchases, net of sales and redemptions, valued at initial purchase price. History list: on 19 March, 18 June and 5 November 2020 the Committee expanded the facility (three expansions in 2020).
Bank of England Independent Evaluation Office, IEO evaluation of the Bank of England’s approach to quantitative easing, 13 January 2021 (Purchases announced by November 2020 as a share of GDP; the rounds; agreement that yields fell): https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/independent-evaluation-office/ieo-report-january-2021/ieo-evaluation-of-the-bank-of-englands-approach-to-quantitative-easing. Paraphrased. Retrieved 1 October 2026. As of November 2020 the Committee had announced purchases equivalent to over 40 per cent of annual UK GDP, the vast majority of them UK government debt; the portfolio also includes around GBP20 billion of corporate bonds. Rounds of QE in 2009 and in response to the 2016 vote to leave the EU. The literature shows broad consensus that QE programmes lowered government bond yields and eased financial conditions; evidence on GDP and inflation is more limited.
Bank of England, Quantitative easing (web page) (How buying bonds lowers yields and other interest rates; the Bank’s view on inflation): https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetary-policy/quantitative-easing. Paraphrased. Retrieved 1 October 2026. Bonds pay a fixed sum of interest, the coupon; when buying pushes a bond’s price up relative to its coupon, its yield goes down. Gilt yields are a benchmark for other interest rates, and lower gilt yields feed through to lower mortgage rates. Asset managers who sell bonds may buy other assets such as shares, pushing their prices up and making owners wealthier and so likely to spend more, boosting economic activity. The Bank says research suggests QE has supported its aim of keeping inflation low and stable. The last announced increase in QE was in November 2020. The GBP5 coupon at GBP100 and GBP125 in this module is the module’s own example: 5/100 = 5 per cent, 5/125 = 4 per cent.
William R. Cline, Quantity Theory of Money Redux? Will Inflation Be the Legacy of Quantitative Easing?, Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief 15-7, May 2015 (The 2015 view that fears of inflation from the purchases had not been borne out): https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/publications/pb/pb15-7.pdf. Paraphrased. Retrieved 1 October 2026. Page 1: some economists and financial practitioners feared that the build-up of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet under QE would bring a sharp rise in inflation; after the United States, the United Kingdom also adopted QE; so far those fears had not been validated. The brief is mainly about the United States: the money base rose sharply but the broad money available to the public did not.
Bank of England, Michael McLeay, Amar Radia and Ryland Thomas, Money creation in the modern economy, Quarterly Bulletin 2014 Q1 (Sellers of gilts move into other assets; QE needs no extra lending): https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/quarterly-bulletin/2014/money-creation-in-the-modern-economy.pdf. Paraphrased; read from the PDF text. Banks cannot lend reserves to the public, because only banks hold reserves accounts. In QE the Bank buys mainly from non-bank financial firms such as pension funds and insurers; each purchase credits reserves to the seller’s bank and a new deposit to the seller. QE adds to the deposits of the sellers of gilts without directly leading to, or requiring, an increase in bank lending; sellers move into other assets.
National Institute of Economic and Social Research, National Institute UK Economic Outlook, Summer 2021, Box B: The long and uncertain road to exiting Quantitative Easing (The median UK estimate of the effect on ten-year gilt yields, and doubts about later rounds): https://www.niesr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Box-B-The-long-and-uncertain-road-to-exiting-Quantitative-Easing-5.pdf. Paraphrased; read from the PDF text, Figure B.1 and the paragraph beside it. Across the literature, estimates normalised to purchases of 10 per cent of GDP; three studies for the UK; the UK median is a fall of 46.5 basis points in ten-year gilt yields (US 67.5, euro area 68). Some studies find smaller effects in later rounds. Derived: 4 x 46.5 = 186 basis points for purchases of 40 per cent of GDP (the module’s arithmetic, not NIESR’s).
Resolution Foundation, Quantitative displeasing (publication page) (The usual estimate: long-term rates down 0.5 to 1 percentage points per 10 per cent of GDP): https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/publications/quantitative-displeasing/. Paraphrased. Retrieved 1 October 2026. Evidence supports the theory that QE lowers long-term interest rates: by around 0.5 to 1 percentage points for bond purchases equal to 10 per cent of GDP.
European Central Bank, Asset purchase programmes (explainer) (Investors buying assets abroad can lower the exchange rate, which pushes inflation up): https://www.ecb.europa.eu/ecb/educational/explainers/tell-me-more/html/app.en.html. Paraphrased. Retrieved 1 October 2026. Portfolio rebalancing: if investors use the money from selling assets to the central bank to buy higher-yielding assets abroad, the exchange rate may fall, which tends to push inflation up. Used for the mechanism only; the page makes no euro-area comparison.
Congressional Research Service, Quantitative Easing and the Growth in the Federal Reserve’s Balance Sheet, R41540 (section: Exchange Rate Channel) (Asset purchases tend to lower the currency): https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R41540.html. US government work, public domain. Most models predict that QE, like any monetary stimulus, reduces the value of the currency; a weaker currency raises exports and lowers imports. Used for the mechanism only.
All wording is our own. Charts are drawn from the data named under them.