Before you start
What you'll be able to answer
- Why did borrowing abroad leave these economies exposed to a sudden run?
- What were the rescues led by the International Monetary Fund (IMF)?
- What did the crisis cost in 1998?
Where this sits
The Asian Financial Crisis — 1997 to 2000 · this module is lit
- 2 Jul 1997Thailand floats the baht
- 14 Aug 1997Indonesia floats the rupiah
- 20 Aug 1997The IMF approves a loan of about $3.9 billion for Thailand
- Nov 1997The IMF approves a loan of about $10.1 billion for Indonesia, and Indonesia closes 16 banks
- 4 Dec 1997The IMF approves a loan of about $21 billion for Korea
- 24 Dec 1997Korea's programme is speeded up and international banks agree to keep rolling over their loans
- 21 May 1998President Suharto of Indonesia resigns
- Aug 1998A crisis in Russia spreads panic beyond Asia
- 1-2 Sep 1998Malaysia restricts money leaving the country and fixes the ringgit against the dollar
- 1999Growth returns across the region, fastest in Korea
On 2 July 1997 Thailand stopped holding its currency steady
For years Thailand's central bank had kept its currency, the baht, close to a fixed rate against the US dollar. In 1997 traders bet that it could not last, and the bank spent its dollars buying baht to hold the rate. On 2 July 1997 it gave up and let the baht float, so the market would set its price.
In June 1997 one US dollar bought about 25 Thai baht. By January 1998, how many baht did a dollar buy?
About 53. The baht had lost more than half of its value against the dollar in seven months.
The borrowing of the 1990s
Through the 1990s banks and companies in Thailand, Indonesia, South Korea and their neighbours borrowed heavily from abroad. The banks lent much of that money on at home, and bank lending grew by more than 10 per cent a year after inflation in most of the region, much of it into property and company investment.
Much of the foreign borrowing was due within a year, and it was owed in dollars or yen. With the local currency held close to the dollar, few borrowers paid to protect themselves against a fall. So a fall in the currency would raise their debts in local money. Lenders who saw the risk would stop renewing loans. A central bank can defend its currency by raising interest rates, which pays investors more to hold it. But higher rates also raise what borrowers pay, so the defence would hurt the same indebted banks and firms.
The float and the fall of the baht
The chart shows how many baht one US dollar bought each month. A rising line means a weaker baht. Speculators had been selling baht for months, and the Bank of Thailand had committed much of its dollars to defending the rate. After the float the baht fell fast. By January 1998 it took about 53 baht to buy a dollar, against about 25 in June 1997.
Every Thai bank and firm with dollar debts now owed far more in baht, and lenders abroad grew less willing to renew their loans.
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, H.10, via FRED (series EXTHUS). Public domain.
Check yourself
Look at the chart. What happened to the baht during 1998?
Thailand's neighbours had not floated their currencies in July 1997. Why might trouble in Thailand reach them within weeks?
Investors pulled money out of economies they thought shared Thailand's weak points, short-term dollar debts and weak banks, and each fall made them warier of the next.
The spread to the neighbours and Korea
Investors who had lent to Thailand looked again at its neighbours. Where they saw the same short-term dollar debts and weak banks, they pulled money out. Within weeks of the float the Philippine peso, the Malaysian ringgit and the Indonesian rupiah came under pressure, and in August Indonesia let the rupiah float. By late October the pressure had reached South Korea, the world's eleventh largest economy, and in December Korea floated its currency, the won.
In January 1998 the chairman of the US Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, told Congress: "Vicious cycles of ever rising and reinforcing fears have become contagious."
Thailand, Indonesia and Korea turned for help to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which lends to countries that cannot pay their foreign bills, and to other lenders. Roughly how much did the IMF and other lenders commit to the three in all?
About 118 billion dollars in all by January 1999, from the IMF, the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank and lending governments. These were promises of loans, to be paid over time, and not all of it was paid.
The rescue loans and their conditions
The IMF approved loans of about 3.9 billion dollars for Thailand in August 1997, about 10.1 billion for Indonesia in November and about 21 billion for Korea in December. The money was paid in stages, and only as each country met its conditions: higher interest rates for a time to steady the currency, budget targets, and closing or rebuilding weak banks.
In Indonesia the government closed 16 banks on 1 November. Three of them were partly owned by relatives of President Suharto, and the family fought the closures: a son moved his bank's business elsewhere, and a half-brother went to court. The fight, and a belief, rightly held, that other weak banks were still open, made the public doubt the clean-up. Runs followed at many other banks. In Korea foreign banks kept pulling their short-term loans until, on 24 December 1997, the big international banks agreed to keep lending.
Check yourself
Work from the IMF's three loans in this section, and the total of about 118 billion dollars that all lenders had committed. Roughly what share of that total, in per cent, did the IMF's three loans make up?
30 %
About 30 per cent: 3.9 + 10.1 + 21 = 35, and 35 is about 0.30 of 118. With an addition for Indonesia in 1998, the IMF's part stood at about 36 billion by January 1999, still about 31 per cent.
Indonesia in 1998, and Malaysia's route
The rupiah kept falling into 1998. Indonesia's IMF programme required the government to cut the subsidies that kept fuel cheap. In early May it raised fuel prices, faster than the IMF had advised, according to the IMF's evaluation office. The rises set off unrest, including riots targeting Indonesia's ethnic Chinese community, and later that month President Suharto resigned.
In August 1998 a crisis in Russia spread panic far beyond Asia. Malaysia had not taken IMF loans, as a US Congressional Research Service report notes. At first it tightened policy much as the rescued countries did. Then it took a different route: on 1 September it restricted money leaving the country, and the next day it fixed the ringgit against the dollar.
Check yourself
On 24 December 1997 the big international banks agreed together to keep lending to Korea's banks. Why could a joint agreement stop a rush that single banks had kept up?
The recession of 1998 and the recovery
In 1998 the financial crisis became a recession. Output fell by about 13 per cent in Indonesia, by more than 7 per cent in Thailand and Malaysia, by about 5 per cent in Korea and slightly in the Philippines. Firms closed, jobs were lost and poverty rose.
In 1999 growth returned. Korea grew by about 11.6 per cent, Thailand by about 4.6 per cent and Indonesia by under 1 per cent. The IMF put the rebound down to households and firms spending again, to exports, and to interest rates kept low to support growth, and it credited its own programmes too. Why the crisis happened, and whether the IMF's conditions helped or hurt, is still argued; the last module of this series takes it up. But what had the region borrowed before 1997, and why could Thailand not hold the baht? The next module goes back to the start.
Check yourself
Three of these were conditions of the IMF-led rescues. Which one was not?
Check yourself
The key questions
Why did borrowing abroad leave these economies exposed to a sudden run?
Banks and firms in Thailand and its neighbours had borrowed heavily abroad, much of it short-term and in dollars, while their currencies were held close to the dollar. Lenders could pull out quickly, and a falling currency raised what borrowers owed.
What were the rescues led by the International Monetary Fund (IMF)?
Loans to Thailand, Indonesia and Korea from the IMF and other lenders, paid in stages as each country raised interest rates for a time, met budget targets and closed or rebuilt weak banks.
What did the crisis cost in 1998?
Recessions across the region: output fell by about 13 per cent in Indonesia, firms closed, jobs were lost and poverty rose.
The numbers
Check yourself
A Thai firm earned its income in baht and owed its foreign lenders dollars. What did the fall of the baht in 1997 do to the size of that debt, counted in baht?
Check yourself
Suppose a rescued country fell behind on the conditions of its IMF loan. What could the lenders do?
Check yourself
In which of these countries did output fall by the most in 1998?